Movie: Machete
Starring: Danny Trejo, Cheech Marin
Genre:Action
Year: 2010
Format: online (Netflix Canada)
plot: A Mexican cop has his world torn apart when his wife is killed. Three years later, after going into hiding, he's set up to take the fall for shooting a politician. Soon, he's running with a group of underground rebels and a border cop all trying to prove the city's corrupt.
I ended up really liking this film. Not what I was first expecting, but there were some great moments of laugh out loudness, and the story worked given it was designed to be like the exploitation films of the 1970's. (Which I always found to have little plot.)
This is the beginning of a trilogy... er trilogy and a half...er a spin off ... as the characters were originally introduced in a segment of the movie Grindhouse. Machete Kills and Machete Kills Again are both slated for production.
In the what did I learn from this movie part...always trust your instincts. You never know who is really on your side until put to the test.
Showing posts with label grindhouse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grindhouse. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Year 3 Day 1
Labels:
2010,
action,
comedy,
crime,
cultclassic,
exploitation,
grindhouse,
hcvp,
movies,
poster,
western,
year3
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Swap Meat
Movie: The Casserole Club
Where: my sofa on Netflix Canada
Reason for seeing it: the title got my attention obviously, and bonus when I found out Kevin Richardson of the Backstreet Boys was a lead actor.
Holy cocktail weiners Batman. Where to I start on this one. When I heard about this film's title, of course I went looking for the trailer. It made it look like a really low budget film. But so many movies are being done lately that are so, nothing new. Then I read the reviews others had of it on Netflix Canada, and most were just nasty. One person had something nice to say about the film. Mostly about how the settings and costumes were bang on for the decade it's set in. They even went on to talk about how it's faded in that style of a 1960's/1970's film, which is the time frame of the film. Which, I have to hand it to the film maker, is brilliant. If for no other reason see this film for the set design and costumes and take it as a really great slice of history in review.
Then I watched the film. And seriously, I wasn't sure I was going to make it past the first 15 minutes, but ironically, I'm glad I did. I think if it had been me, I wouldn't have edited it in a liner form but done it with intercutting flashbacks...but that's getting off the point.
The first 15 minutes is the big set up for the film, and is just a cocktail party of drunks who are acting like fifteen year olds. So you think at first.
plot: Five couples living in the same suburb neighbourhood, get together one night to have a casserole contest, with the wives cooking and the husbands picking the winner. After supper, everyone gets extremely drunk and decide to have an orgy in the pool. The next day, as everyone tries to pretend it didn't happen, we start to see the break down of four of the five marriages. Over the course of the next few weeks, they all decide to have another dinner party, which ends with one wife having an affair with one of the men in the group and ends up pregnant. One more party happens a few weeks later, this time they've introduced another couple, which doesn't go well with half the group, and someone ends up dead.
Seriously, at first glance, this film seems like just a made for tv porno. But once you get past that first party scene and into the grit of the dynamic of the couples, you understand why the film was made. Everyone of them have major insecurities that seem to affect how they treat each other (from the husband in couple A being a self mutilator and rejecting his wife over and over, to the husband of couple C who is a bisexual trying to convince everyone he's a straight stud because of his wife) the cruelty they subtly and not so subtly inflict on each other at times, all leading to the breaking down of most of their marriages.
This is an excellent story of pulling away the curtain to see the plastic forest for what it is, and the masks they all wear.
Were this set in this decade, it wouldn't have worked as well as it did. Just the use of the casserole scenes themselves were a great metaphor. (the women talking about the easiness of canned soup and spam which little to no real prep time but yet no one discussing anything of real value)
I know some of the reviewers were talking about how bad the acting was, and yes the first party scene I think had some lame ducks in it, but as the movie continues, you see it for what it is; following a recipe laid out in the 1960's/1970's when acting really was that cardboard and flavourless. It really feels like you're watching something from the Exploitation era.
I only wish there were more dinner table scenes.
Where: my sofa on Netflix Canada
Reason for seeing it: the title got my attention obviously, and bonus when I found out Kevin Richardson of the Backstreet Boys was a lead actor.
Holy cocktail weiners Batman. Where to I start on this one. When I heard about this film's title, of course I went looking for the trailer. It made it look like a really low budget film. But so many movies are being done lately that are so, nothing new. Then I read the reviews others had of it on Netflix Canada, and most were just nasty. One person had something nice to say about the film. Mostly about how the settings and costumes were bang on for the decade it's set in. They even went on to talk about how it's faded in that style of a 1960's/1970's film, which is the time frame of the film. Which, I have to hand it to the film maker, is brilliant. If for no other reason see this film for the set design and costumes and take it as a really great slice of history in review.
Then I watched the film. And seriously, I wasn't sure I was going to make it past the first 15 minutes, but ironically, I'm glad I did. I think if it had been me, I wouldn't have edited it in a liner form but done it with intercutting flashbacks...but that's getting off the point.
The first 15 minutes is the big set up for the film, and is just a cocktail party of drunks who are acting like fifteen year olds. So you think at first.
plot: Five couples living in the same suburb neighbourhood, get together one night to have a casserole contest, with the wives cooking and the husbands picking the winner. After supper, everyone gets extremely drunk and decide to have an orgy in the pool. The next day, as everyone tries to pretend it didn't happen, we start to see the break down of four of the five marriages. Over the course of the next few weeks, they all decide to have another dinner party, which ends with one wife having an affair with one of the men in the group and ends up pregnant. One more party happens a few weeks later, this time they've introduced another couple, which doesn't go well with half the group, and someone ends up dead.
Seriously, at first glance, this film seems like just a made for tv porno. But once you get past that first party scene and into the grit of the dynamic of the couples, you understand why the film was made. Everyone of them have major insecurities that seem to affect how they treat each other (from the husband in couple A being a self mutilator and rejecting his wife over and over, to the husband of couple C who is a bisexual trying to convince everyone he's a straight stud because of his wife) the cruelty they subtly and not so subtly inflict on each other at times, all leading to the breaking down of most of their marriages.
This is an excellent story of pulling away the curtain to see the plastic forest for what it is, and the masks they all wear.
Were this set in this decade, it wouldn't have worked as well as it did. Just the use of the casserole scenes themselves were a great metaphor. (the women talking about the easiness of canned soup and spam which little to no real prep time but yet no one discussing anything of real value)
I know some of the reviewers were talking about how bad the acting was, and yes the first party scene I think had some lame ducks in it, but as the movie continues, you see it for what it is; following a recipe laid out in the 1960's/1970's when acting really was that cardboard and flavourless. It really feels like you're watching something from the Exploitation era.
I only wish there were more dinner table scenes.
Labels:
2012,
drama,
exploitation,
food,
grindhouse,
hcvp,
historical,
movies,
poster,
year2
Monday, August 20, 2012
Day 246
Movie: Kill Bill Vol 2
Starring: Uma Thurman, Michael Madsen
Genre: Crime, Action
Year: 2004
Format: Shaw Video On Demand
Plot: The Bride has managed to get revenge on the members of the group that destroyed her life, and is now able to get her hands on her ex, Bill.
This is the western part of the movie.
I liked this half much more then the first half. (Day 245) This part was funnier for starters, and actually had more of the story to it. You're given more of the back story of the characters and you end up connecting more with them.
And Michael Madsen is in this half of the film, I've always been a fan of his.
Because this has more of the storyline to it then the first half, it also makes a bit more sense. You really do have to watch both back to back in order to get the full scope of the plot.
What do I think I learned from this film?
Sometimes the lessons we learn along the journey are truly a scrabbled puzzle until we get to the end of the journey where they make sense. And there is no excuse for controlling and abusive behavouir as you will get what you deserve in the end.
Starring: Uma Thurman, Michael Madsen
Genre: Crime, Action
Year: 2004
Format: Shaw Video On Demand
Plot: The Bride has managed to get revenge on the members of the group that destroyed her life, and is now able to get her hands on her ex, Bill.
This is the western part of the movie.
I liked this half much more then the first half. (Day 245) This part was funnier for starters, and actually had more of the story to it. You're given more of the back story of the characters and you end up connecting more with them.
And Michael Madsen is in this half of the film, I've always been a fan of his.
Because this has more of the storyline to it then the first half, it also makes a bit more sense. You really do have to watch both back to back in order to get the full scope of the plot.
What do I think I learned from this film?
Sometimes the lessons we learn along the journey are truly a scrabbled puzzle until we get to the end of the journey where they make sense. And there is no excuse for controlling and abusive behavouir as you will get what you deserve in the end.
Labels:
2004,
action,
comedy,
crime,
cultclassic,
drama,
exploitation,
filmnoir,
grindhouse,
hcvp,
movies,
poster,
western
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Day 245
Movie: Kill Bill Vol 1
Starring: Uma Thurman, Lucy Lu
Genre:Action, Crime,
Year: 2003
Format: Shaw Video On Demand
Plot: After having been in a coma for four years, a woman sets out for revenge on the group who put her there.
What Quentin Tarantino will go down in history for creating.
This half of the film is the Kung Fu half of the movie, while the second is the Spaghetti Western.
I liked much of this but have to admit, I was put off by the animation segment. I have just never been one for Japanese Anime.
I actually found myself laughing out loud at some of the over the top blood soaked scenes.
It's been years since I first saw the Kill Bill movies, and had forgotten how good the writing of the characters actually were. At first glance, you get the impression it's just a shoot em up - in this case a slice em up- film, but after a bit, you realize how much of a web has been spun around the characters.
What do I think I learned from this film?
Revenge isn't always what you thought it was.
Starring: Uma Thurman, Lucy Lu
Genre:Action, Crime,
Year: 2003
Format: Shaw Video On Demand
Plot: After having been in a coma for four years, a woman sets out for revenge on the group who put her there.
What Quentin Tarantino will go down in history for creating.
This half of the film is the Kung Fu half of the movie, while the second is the Spaghetti Western.
I liked much of this but have to admit, I was put off by the animation segment. I have just never been one for Japanese Anime.
I actually found myself laughing out loud at some of the over the top blood soaked scenes.
It's been years since I first saw the Kill Bill movies, and had forgotten how good the writing of the characters actually were. At first glance, you get the impression it's just a shoot em up - in this case a slice em up- film, but after a bit, you realize how much of a web has been spun around the characters.
What do I think I learned from this film?
Revenge isn't always what you thought it was.
Labels:
2003,
action,
cartoon,
comedy,
crime,
cultclassic,
drama,
exploitation,
fantasy,
filmnoir,
grindhouse,
hcvp,
movies,
poster,
western
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



